Stunning Of Animals Before Slaughter


1. Is the beef from abattoirs that is slaughtered (with Tasmiyyah) using the stunning method Halaal to consume?

2. Does the current stunning method used meet the Islamic slaughter requirements?

I would appreciate the Islamic ruling on this matter as I have refrained from consuming beef until I have a ruling.


We will firstly discuss the Islamic perspective on the act of stunning and thereafter the status of the animal itself which was stunned prior to Zabah as they are two independent issues.

Pre-Slaughter Stunning

Stunning the animal before it is actually slaughtered is a common practice in many western countries. It was introduced for two main reasons:

1) The false imaginary idea that it is more comforting and causes less pain to the animal.
2) To immobilize the animal to facilitate rapid and swift killing procedures in order to gain more profit and money.

There are many methods used for stunning animals, just to mention a few:-

The Captive Bolt Pistol

This stunning method is widely used for cattle at abattoirs. There are two types of a captive bolt pistol i.e. penetrative and non-penetrative. Penetrative stunners drive a bolt into the skull and cause unconsciousness both through physical brain damage and the concussive blow to the skull. On the other hand, the bolt on a non-penetrative stunner is ‘mushroom-headed’ and impacts on the brain without entering the skull. Unconsciousness is caused by the concussive blow. After the animal is unconscious, it is slaughtered.

The bolt is described as ‘captive’ because it flies out of the barrel but remains attached to the pistol. The pistol is placed on the centre of the animal’s forehead and is either trigger-fired or fires automatically on contact with the animal’s head.

Water bath Stunning

The electric water bath is widely used to stun chickens, turkeys, ducks and geese. Birds are shackled upside down on a moving conveyor, which carries them to an electrified water bath into which their heads are supposed to be immersed. The shackles contact a bar which is connected to the earth.

Gas Stunning

An animal is stunned by exposing them to a mixture of carbon dioxide and air. This gas causes the animal to lose its consciousness, after which it is slaughtered.

Some of these methods are reversible and others are irreversible. When irreversible methods of stunning are applied, the animal will die if it is not slaughtered within a few minutes. Other methods are reversible in theory and the animal can get up and walk around if not slaughtered in a few minutes.

Islamic Stance on the Act of Stunning:

The common factor in all the afore-mentioned methods of stunning is causing extra pain to the animal. The animal experiences the pangs of death even before its time. It is an utterly pointless method of subjecting the animal to unnecessary cruelty and torture. There is absolutely no scope in Islam for causing the animal this type of distress. This method of slaughtering is against the Sunnah practice and the way prescribed by Sharee’ah. For this reason it is Makrooh-e-Tahrimi (extremely detested, bordering Haram) to adopt this method. Therefore, we must resort to the Islamic, Sunnah methodology and abandon such inhumane traits. We also find clear cut texts in the Fiqh Books that to cause any type of pain to the animal is a detested and abhorred act and has been condemned by Sharee’ah.

Hereunder we will mention some texts of the Fataawa (verdicts) issued by some of our great prominent senior Ulama (Akaabir) regarding the act of pre- slaughter stunning. We will also mention the names of the Ulama who issued these Fataawa and the names of their respected books:

1) Moulana Ashraf Ali Thaanwi rahmatullahi alaih issued a Fatwa on the issue of stunning prior to slaughter. He has stated it to be a forbidden practice.
Imdaadul Fataawaa, Vol: 3, Pg: 605, Maktabah Darul Uloom Karachi Edition

2) Mufti Kifaayatullah Rahmatullahi alaih comments on captive bolt stunning as follows: “This practice conflicts with the Sunnah and Islamic teachings. There is the strong possibility of the animal being Haram. That is, if death becomes certain it is futile to cut its throat, and the animal will be Haram”.
Kifaayatul Mufti, Vol: 8, Pg: 277, Maktabah Imdadiyyah Edition

3) Mufti Mahmood Hasan Gangohi Rahmatullahi alaih has described the practice of stunning to be contradictory to the established Sunnah method and Makroohe Tahreemi. He says that this is putting the animal in the state of death before the actual time of death because of which even a large portion of the animals blood also gets dried up and the meat loses all its nutrients and the meat is no longer tasty. There is no scope in Sharee’ah to give such pain to an animal.
Fataawaa Mahmoodiyyah, Vol: 26, Pg: 156, Maktabah Mahmodiyyah Edition

4) Mufti Abdur Raheem Laajpuri Rahmatullahi alaih has described the practice of stunning to control the animal using the captive bolt method as “extremely Makrooh”.
Fataawa Raheemiyyah, Vol: 10, Pg: 67, Darul Isha’at Edition

5) Moulana Yusuf Ludhyaanwi Rahmatullahi alaih comments on stunning as follows: “This method of slaughter is incorrect. If there had been any relief for the animal in striking the head and Allah had preferred this method, then the Messenger of Allah Sallallahu alaihi wasallam himself would have taught this method. Those persons who have devised this method are essentially trying to prove themselves cleverer than Rasoolullah Sallallahu alaihi wasallam. If this method is prevalent in Pakistan or any other Muslim country, it should be stopped immediately.”
Aap Ke Masaail Aur Unka Hul, Vol: 5, Pg: 452, Maktabah Ludhyaanwi Edition

6) Mufti Muhammed Taqi Uthmani (D.B.) states: “If the stunning can lead to death of animal, then it is not permissible to stun.
Buhooth Fi Qadhaya Fiqhiyya Mua’sara, Vol: 2, Pg: 54, Maktabah Darul Uloom Karachi Edition

Please note: The discussion thus far was in connection to the act of stunning only. Now we will discuss the status of animal that is stunned prior to slaughter. As your query pertains to beef, the procedure generally adopted for cattle nowadays at most abattoirs is the captive-bolt stunning method which is irreversible. Our subsequent discussion will thus primarily focus on cattle that are stunned using this method. 

Legal Status of Cattle Stunned Prior to Zabah/Slaughter

Stunning is an unacceptable action and the person who stuns will be sinful for causing extra pain to the cattle. However, the impermissibility of the act of stunning does not influence the lawfulness of the cattle which was stunned and does not necessarily mean that all stunned cattle are Haraam/unlawful to consume. The legal status of the cattle that was stunned (by Muslim or non-Muslim) is dependent on whether it was alive at the time of slaughter. If the animal was indeed alive at the time of a proper Halaal slaughter, then the meat of such an animal will be Halaal to consume.

On the other hand, if it is established that the animal was indeed dead at the time of slaughter, such an animal will be Haraam to consume despite the fact that it was slaughtered in accordance to Islamic law.

If we deeply think and ponder in this matter, we will come to a conclusion that there is a great doubt in the pre-slaughtered stunned cattle (that are stunned by the captive-bolt method), that was it actually alive or dead before slaughtering!!!

Since the legal status of the stunned cattle is dependent on it being alive at the time of slaughter, there is a need to establish that it was alive at the time of slaughter. Listed below are some signs which have been derived from Fiqhi texts that can be taken as proof of it being alive at the time of slaughter:

1) Normal, excessive bleeding at the time of slaughter.
2) Closing its mouth or eyes
3) Pulling together its legs
4) Extreme movement of any kind

In conclusion, if the cattle was still alive at the time of slaughtering due to which the blood gushed out forcefully and the animal shuddered (as is the case when slaughtering an animal without the stunning method) then the meat will be Halaal. Otherwise, the animal will be considered dead and the meat Haraam. 

Words of advice

We should try our best to consume meat which was not stunned and support businesses who supply un-stunned Halal meat. There are numerous advantages to un-stunned meat including complete drainage of blood, better consistency of the meat, more retention of nutrients and most importantly, no fear of the animal dying due to the stunning. It is better to consume something which is 100% Halaal than consuming something in which a person has doubt. It comes in a Hadeeth of our beloved Nabi sallallahu alaihi wasallam:

Translation: Hazrat Abu Hawrah Rahmatullahi alaih narrates that I enquired from Hazrat Hasan Bin Ali Radhiallahu anhu that what did you acquire from Rasoolullah Sallallahu alaihi wasallam? He replied that I acquired this Hadeeth from Rasoolullah Sallallahu alaihi wasallam: 

“Leave out that thing which puts you in doubt for that thing which does not put you in doubt; and that speaking the truth gives satisfaction and speaking lies destroys a person”
Jaamiut-Tirmidhi 4/322 – Nashrus-Sunnah

From the aforementioned discussion on captive-bolt stunning, it is evident that some doubt remains with regard to the consumption of the meat of cattle that is stunned using this method. Hence we commend your stance up to now of abstaining from consuming beef that has been acquired from cattle that are stunned in this way. If you wish to consume beef, then you should acquire it from a farm or other sources that do not deploy the captive bolt stunning method but rather implement the normal procedure of Islamic slaughter.

Checked and Approved By:

Mufti Muhammed Saeed Motara Saheb D.B.


وكره كل تعذيب بلا فائدة. رد المحتار،كتاب الذبائح،ج ٦،ص ٢٩٦،ايج ايم سعمد

ل ذلك مكروه لأنه تعذيب الحيوان بلا ضرورة ، والحاصل أن كل ما فيه زيادة ألم لا يحتاج إليه في الذكاة مكروه ، كذا في الكافي. الفتاوى الهندية، كتاب الذبائح،ج ٥،ص ٢٨٨،دار احياء التراث 

(ذبح شاة لم تدر حياتها وقت الذبح ) ولم تتحرك ولم يخرج الدم ( إن فتحت فاها لا تؤكل ، وإن ضمته أكلت ، وإن فتحت عينها لا تؤكل وإن ضمتها أكلت ، وإن مدت رجلها لا تؤكل ، وإن قبضتها أكلت ، وإن نام شعرها لا تؤكل ، وإن قام أكلت ) لأن الحيوان يسترخى بالموت ؛ ففتح فم وعين ومد رجل ونوم شعر علامة الموت لأنها استرخاء ومقابلها حركات تختص بالحي فدل على حياته ، وهذا كله إذا لم تعلم الحياة ( وإن علمت حياتها ) وإن قلت ( وقت الذبح أكلت مطلقا ) بكل حال زيلعي. ( قوله ولم تتحرك إلخ ) أي بعد الذبح بحركة اضطرابية كحركة المذبوح وإلا فضم العين وقبض الرجل حركة رد المحتار،كتاب الذبائح،ج ٦،ص ٣٠،ايج ايم سعد 

رجل ذبح شاة مريضة فلم يتحرك منها إلا فوها إن فتحت فاها لا تؤكل ، وإن ضمته أكلت ، وإن فتحت عينها لا تؤكل ، وإن غمضتها أكلت ، وإن مدت رجليها لا تؤكل ، وإن قبضتهما أكلت ، وإن لم يقم شعرها لا تؤكل ، وإن قام أكلت ، هذا كله إذا لم يعلم أنها حية وقت الذبح لتكون هذه علامة الحياة فيها ، أما إذا علمت حياتها يقينا وقت الذبح أكلت بكل حال ، كذا في السراج الوهاج . الفتاوى الهندية، كتاب الذبائح،ج ٥،ص ٢٨٦،دار احياء التراث

(ذبح شاة ) مريضة ( فتحركت أو خرج الدم ) ( حلت وإلا لا إن لم تدر حياته ) عند الذبح ، وإن علم حياته ( حلت ) مطلقا ( وإن لم تتحرك ولم يخرج الدم ) (قوله فتحركت ): أي بغير نحو مد رجل وفتح عين مما لا يدل على الحياة كما يأتي 

( قوله أو خرج الدم ): أي كما يخرج من الحي . قال في البزازية : وفي شرح الطحاوي : خروج الدم لا يدل على الحياة إلا إذا كان يخرج كما يخرج من الحي عند الإمام ، وهو ظاهر الرواية رد المحتار،كتاب الذبائح،ج ٦،ص ٣٠٨،ايج ايم سعد

المتردية والمنخنقة والموقوذة والشاة المريضة والنطيحة ومشقوقة البطن إذا ذبحت ينظر إن كان فيها حياة مستقرة حلت بالذبح بالإجماع ، وإن لم تكن الحياة فيها مستقرة تحل بالذبح سواء عاش أو لا يعيش عند أبي حنيفة – رحمه الله تعالى – وهو الصحيح وعليه الفتوى ، كذا في محيط السرخسي . وأما خروج الدم بعد الذبح فيما لا يحل إلا بالذبح فهل هو من شرائط الحل فلا رواية فيه عن أصحابنا ، وذكر في بعض الفتاوى أنه لا بد من أحد شيئين إما التحرك ، وإما خروج الدم ، فإن لم يوجد لا تحل ، كذا في البدائع . وإن ذبح شاة أو بقرة فخرج منها دم ، ولم تتحرك وخروجه مثل ما يخرج من الحي أكلت عند أبي حنيفة – رحمه الله تعالى – وبه نأخذ الفتاوى الهندية، كتاب الذبائح،ج ٥،ص ٢٨٦، دار احياء التراث

حدثنا أبو موسى الأنصاري حدثنا عبد الله بن إدريس حدثنا شعبة عن بريد بن أبي مريم عن أبي الحوارء السعدي قال قلت للحسن بن علي ما حفظت من رسول الله حفظت من رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم ؟ قال حفظت من رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم دع ما يريبك إلى مالا يريبك فإن الصدق طمأنينة وإن الكذب ريبة جامع الترمذى،باب،ج ٤،ص ٣٢٢، نشر السنة

Purpose and Scope
The information provided on this website is intended for informational and educational purposes only. Fatawa provided on this website are context-dependent, scenario-specific and are impacted by interpretations and individual circumstances.
The information provided on this website is not a substitute for an independent, scenario-specific question, and must not be used to determine or establish a ruling for any other circumstance, situation or dispute.
Accuracy and Reliability
While Darul-Ifta - Darul Uloom Azaadville strives for accuracy, errors may occur. Users are encouraged to verify information independently and notify the Darul-Ifta of any discrepancies.
We reserve the right to edit, moderate or remove any content.
No Legal Authority
Fatawa provided on this website are not legal judgments but rather religious rulings. Legal matters should be addressed through appropriate legal channels.
By using this website, users agree to these terms and conditions.